RAPID  PRODUCT  DEVELOPMENT

Case Study 2: Development of a bracket of the new power train assembly at FORD

 

Ford Motor Company, Power Train Operations is located in Dearborn, Michigan. This organization is responsible for the design, engineering and manufacturing of Ford's worldwide engines and transmissions for Ford and Ford's worldwide subsidiaries. They required a new power train assembly for a newly designed automotive model. Although the base engine design was complete, the top cast support bracket, a component that holds the engine in proper position in the engine compartment, was still under development. Only four weeks remained before the scheduled delivery of six complete engine assemblies to Europe. Without this bracket, the development program and testing cycles could not proceed on time.

Ford's challenge now centered on how to produce a prototype aluminum support bracket, allow adequate time to cast and machine the parts and test the components within the 4-week time frame. At this point, Ford only had the CAD drawings to assess the design, and there was not enough time to create tools to produce the casting patterns. Moreover, there was reluctance to create expensive tooling at this stage. If Ford was forced to rethink material choices, separate tooling would be required to handle the different shrinkage rates of the alternate materials.

Because of the speed of the Z Corp 3D Printer, Ford was able to create 3D conceptual models as well as actual casting patterns. The first model produced was used as a design and fit aid. It was made to scale and was placed inside the actual engine to determine if the design was correct. After making one minor change to the CAD file, the design was accepted, and six Z Corp patterns were produced for casting. These patterns were printed to reflect shrinkage that would occur after the metal was poured for casting. The six patterns made for the six engine assemblies were then sent to an investment casting foundry for production.

The foundry that Ford used is experienced using RP patterns for investment casting. The cast aluminum parts were produced within three weeks and delivered for machining. This was a considerable improvement in speed; the foundry reported that production of parts like these from other RP methods traditionally takes up to twice as long because of a combination of build time, post-processing and foundry preparation. Because of the wax coating available on the Z Corp. models, a simple method of attaching gates and runners was quickly developed at the foundry and there were no problems with expansion or shell cracking. In addition, burn-out resulted in acceptable levels of residual ash, which was easily removed from the molds.

The six parts that were investment cast had a 100% success rate with no pattern or shell problems. The parts showed no sign of surface deformation and a uniform tolerance level was measured. The parts were delivered in time to allow for machining and assembly. The completed prototype assemblies were shipped to Europe on time and at Ford's high quality standards.

RPD has given Ford the potential to reduce many intangible operating expenses and improve their operations through: (1) early detection of design flaws; (2) improved communication of design intent to suppliers, engineers and designers; (3) reduction of Powertrain's overall time to market.